Is There Any Correlation between Capitalization Rates and Years?

realtycapital, 22 October 2008, No comments
Categories: Education, News|Views

Chicago, Illinois, October 22, 2008 — The start of the mortgage meltdown over a year ago continues wrecking havoc on the real estate capital markets.  In particular, accurate property valuation is nearly impossible as buyers and sellers are sidelined due to limited debt availability. 

Few properties are trading hands.  Most investors believe values are trending downward in response to economic malaise, oversupply and lack of affordable debt.  As such, experts are using higher cap rates for valuating assets for most types of commercial and income properties.  Lenders, in particular, are “creating” values by underwriting capitalization rates which may, or may not, reflect current market prices.  These cap rates are typically higher than many sellers are buyers expect, resulting in lower loan proceeds based on loan-to-value restrictions.  Yet, owners often refuse to sell or acknowledge asset values based on lenders’ higher cap rates, choosing to do nothing, instead.

In this stalemate, who’s right and where are cap rates heading? 

An amusing theory discussed by some experts as a humorous factoid suggests that current capitalization rates are directly correlated to the recent year numerical identity as indexed to the current real estate capital boom/bust cycle. Today’s market cycle peaked in 2007, with 2005 and 2006 ranking as the best years for very attractive valuations; in other words, low capitalization rates.

As for 2008, an 8% capitalization rate is the “strike price” for sellers motivated to liquidate properties.  While the markets are illiquid and few transactions leave any proof of value, an 8% capitalization rate reflects a weighted-average premium tied to the cost of capital for most types of income properties.  Applying the same logic in a downward market, 2009 should yield a 9% rate and a 10% cap rate would prevail in 2010.

Linking cap rates to year numerology is certainly an unrealistic discussion for measuring values in the currently volatile market.  Yet as investors search for answers in such uncertain times, numerology adds more theories to an already confusing time.

Comments

Leave a Reply:

Name *

Mail (hidden) *

Website

Las Vegas, NV - February 6, 2010 - According to industry leaders gathering in Las Vegas this week, debt capital is readily available for 2010.  Optimism is in the air and the mortgage lenders are starting to offer more generous terms and conditions.  In summary, timing is excellent for select borrowers in securing debt based on the following conditions:  (1) Recovering economy, (2) Ample supply of capital and (3) Limited supply of financeable real estate assets.  The following highlights summarize the 2010 state of the realty capital markets including an overall outlook and overall funding program offerings:  Back to Basics:  As lenders workout of their legacy problems, new funding goals surface which are clearly more ambitious than 2009. Still underwriting of actual numbers w/o projections, yet inflation fears exist. Most lenders are Indifferent to spreads, but not competition. Valuing real estate properties in a declining market still a challenge. More allocation of funds available above target amounts if deal flow is of sufficient quality Underwriting Dynamics:  As has been the case last year, high-quality projects in major markets backed by excellent sponsorship and cash flow characteristics are most desired—especially based on low leverage of 65% of value.  Location/Property Types: Major MSAs strongly preferred for optional pricing and leverage.  Otherwise a substantially most costly financing with lower leverage. Preferred property types ranked in order:  (1) Multifamily, (2) Credit-Tenant lease of all property types, (3) Industrial, (4) Retail, (5) Office - however medical office ranks equal to Industrial and (5) Lodging. Pricing (Permanent Fixed-Rate Loan): Agency pricing for apartments starts in the low to mid-5% range for 5 year or greater term. Life company pricing starts mid-5% to 6% for 5 years or more term mostly targeted for commercial property pricing (agencies are more competitively priced) More entrepreneurial funds start at 7% or more targeting secondary markets, smaller fundings, older properties and lodging assets. Add a pricing premium of 25 to 50 basis points for loans below $5 million. Yield differential disappearing - typical ($5 to $50 million) vs. larger loans. Forward funds available up to a year based on 6 o 8 basis points premium per month.  Leverage: Above 65% LTV on a select basis combined with lower spreads. Values based on the lower of: (a) purchase price, (b) appraised value or (c) lender imposed capitalization rate.