The Real Estate Capital Scoreboard® – January 2008

realtycapital, 02 January 2008, No comments
Categories: Scoreboard

Chicago, Illinois — January 2, 2008 — The new year triggers new hopes and fears as real estate capital markets continue readjusting from nearly a decade of uninterrupted volume and pricing momentum.  While many investors fear new funding restrictions, others welcome more disciplined and “customary” underwriting practices deemed to be “normal.”

December reflected continued uncertainty with the Fed dropping rates by a quarter-point for the third consecutive time.  Are more rate cuts in store for 2008?  Will funds continue being more restrictive throughout the year?  These and many other questions revolve around understanding markets as more clearly defined by different lender profiles.  In other words, various lenders offer programs that don’t necessarily converge in pricing and underwriting as was prevalent during the first half of 2007.  In summary, the following key groups of lending platforms are available today:

Banks — Banks, particularly European financial institutions, represent the most attractive floating rate pricing available.  Overall spreads over LIBOR range as low as 170 basis points to over 200 basis points or more, depending upon the risk profile, leverage and property type.  Banks are still relatively active for construction and acquisition loans.

Agencies — Freddie Mac, Fannie Mae and FHA/HUD are the most competitively-priced permanent lenders of any funding source in the marketplace.  Overall pricing of 170 basis points or greater over comparable-term treasuries is still available.  However, multifamily properties are the only beneficiaries of such attractive pricing.

Life insurance companies — Life companies have been the backbone of commercial property lending for more than 100 years.  Permanent loans are priced in excess of 200 basis points over comparable-term treasuries.  Funds are available, although on a more limited basis as allocation benchmarks have been rapidly depleted as some borrowers move away from securitized loans.  Most life insurance companies impose restrictions of 75% leverage with minimum debt service coverage ratios of 120% for traditional income properties including multifamily, retail, industrial and office assets.

Mortgage conduits — By far, the most affected players in the marketplace during the past six to eight months.  Very cautiously funding permanent debt at pricing of at least 275 basis points over comparable-term treasuries.  Securitized lender’s tread capital markets with great caution as daily pricing adjustments cause havoc for lender’s trying to size deals with any certainty.

According to Gary Duff, member of the Editorial Advisory Group of the Real Estate Capital Institute, “Securitized lenders are not currently quoting deals to win.”  Instead, he notes, “They will lend, but only under their terms.”

Comments

Comments are closed.

Leave a Reply:

Name *

Mail (hidden) *

Website

Las Vegas, NV - February 6, 2010 - According to industry leaders gathering in Las Vegas this week, debt capital is readily available for 2010.  Optimism is in the air and the mortgage lenders are starting to offer more generous terms and conditions.  In summary, timing is excellent for select borrowers in securing debt based on the following conditions:  (1) Recovering economy, (2) Ample supply of capital and (3) Limited supply of financeable real estate assets.  The following highlights summarize the 2010 state of the realty capital markets including an overall outlook and overall funding program offerings:  Back to Basics:  As lenders workout of their legacy problems, new funding goals surface which are clearly more ambitious than 2009. Still underwriting of actual numbers w/o projections, yet inflation fears exist. Most lenders are Indifferent to spreads, but not competition. Valuing real estate properties in a declining market still a challenge. More allocation of funds available above target amounts if deal flow is of sufficient quality Underwriting Dynamics:  As has been the case last year, high-quality projects in major markets backed by excellent sponsorship and cash flow characteristics are most desired—especially based on low leverage of 65% of value.  Location/Property Types: Major MSAs strongly preferred for optional pricing and leverage.  Otherwise a substantially most costly financing with lower leverage. Preferred property types ranked in order:  (1) Multifamily, (2) Credit-Tenant lease of all property types, (3) Industrial, (4) Retail, (5) Office - however medical office ranks equal to Industrial and (5) Lodging. Pricing (Permanent Fixed-Rate Loan): Agency pricing for apartments starts in the low to mid-5% range for 5 year or greater term. Life company pricing starts mid-5% to 6% for 5 years or more term mostly targeted for commercial property pricing (agencies are more competitively priced) More entrepreneurial funds start at 7% or more targeting secondary markets, smaller fundings, older properties and lodging assets. Add a pricing premium of 25 to 50 basis points for loans below $5 million. Yield differential disappearing - typical ($5 to $50 million) vs. larger loans. Forward funds available up to a year based on 6 o 8 basis points premium per month.  Leverage: Above 65% LTV on a select basis combined with lower spreads. Values based on the lower of: (a) purchase price, (b) appraised value or (c) lender imposed capitalization rate.