Chicago – A Successful Urban Redevelopment Story

realtycapital, 24 October 2006, No comments
Categories: The Institute

Chicago,  Illinois – October, 2006 — Not a day goes by without a news story about urban America’s rebirth.  Suburban planning issues including sprawl, congestion, rising taxes, infrastructure costs and changing households favor urban redevelopment.  Urban amenities such as pedestrian-friendly infrastructures, public transportation, cultural/recreational amenities and close proximity to employment become important.

Successful urban redevelopment demands an accommodating infrastructure that can support optimum population density with amenities such as open space, transportation and employment opportunities.  While many communities witness urban redevelopment, consistent patterns of performance are varied and sporadic.  Numerous reasons apply including limited geography, unclear urban planning initiatives, inconsistent job growth, etc.  Yet certain markets thrive.

The City of Chicago is such an urban area.   The City has numerous neighborhoods undergoing consistent redevelopment at a measurable pace due to the velocity of the market and the inventory of redevelopable land.  Chicago serves as a laboratory for successful urban redevelopment for a variety of reasons.

Ranked as America’s third-largest city with a population of approximately three million, Chicago’s backbone is an infrastructure mostly built during the late 19th and early 20th Century.  This infrastructure supports public transportation as a first priority, mainly railroad and bus lines.  These buses and railroads crisscross the City, originating from the downtown “hub” in three directions heading north, south and west.  The City is also laid-out in a logical grid system.  For the most part, public transportation is available nearly every quarter-mile — very pedestrian-friendly.

Chicago’s public transportation system supports population densities ranging up to 60,000 people within a mile radius, at least three times more density than typical suburbs.  Transportation costs are more economical based on density and infrastructure.

Most important of all, Chicago’s Loop is a well-established area featuring strong employment, educational, institutional, recreational and residential amenities boasting a daytime population in excess of one million people.

The Real Estate Capital Institute is an example of an organization seeking the urban dynamics offered by Chicago.  Before selecting a location, the Real Estate Capital Institute studied various communities within the City and chose the Homan Square neighborhood in North Lawndale – an area in the midst of redevelopment located minutes west of downtown Chicago.  The Institute’s research director, Nat Zvislo, says “Chicago is one of the great 24-hour cities that attract talent and technology – both necessary for a research organization to thrive.”

Comments

Leave a Reply:

Name *

Mail (hidden) *

Website

Las Vegas, NV - February 6, 2010 - According to industry leaders gathering in Las Vegas this week, debt capital is readily available for 2010.  Optimism is in the air and the mortgage lenders are starting to offer more generous terms and conditions.  In summary, timing is excellent for select borrowers in securing debt based on the following conditions:  (1) Recovering economy, (2) Ample supply of capital and (3) Limited supply of financeable real estate assets.  The following highlights summarize the 2010 state of the realty capital markets including an overall outlook and overall funding program offerings:  Back to Basics:  As lenders workout of their legacy problems, new funding goals surface which are clearly more ambitious than 2009. Still underwriting of actual numbers w/o projections, yet inflation fears exist. Most lenders are Indifferent to spreads, but not competition. Valuing real estate properties in a declining market still a challenge. More allocation of funds available above target amounts if deal flow is of sufficient quality Underwriting Dynamics:  As has been the case last year, high-quality projects in major markets backed by excellent sponsorship and cash flow characteristics are most desired—especially based on low leverage of 65% of value.  Location/Property Types: Major MSAs strongly preferred for optional pricing and leverage.  Otherwise a substantially most costly financing with lower leverage. Preferred property types ranked in order:  (1) Multifamily, (2) Credit-Tenant lease of all property types, (3) Industrial, (4) Retail, (5) Office - however medical office ranks equal to Industrial and (5) Lodging. Pricing (Permanent Fixed-Rate Loan): Agency pricing for apartments starts in the low to mid-5% range for 5 year or greater term. Life company pricing starts mid-5% to 6% for 5 years or more term mostly targeted for commercial property pricing (agencies are more competitively priced) More entrepreneurial funds start at 7% or more targeting secondary markets, smaller fundings, older properties and lodging assets. Add a pricing premium of 25 to 50 basis points for loans below $5 million. Yield differential disappearing - typical ($5 to $50 million) vs. larger loans. Forward funds available up to a year based on 6 o 8 basis points premium per month.  Leverage: Above 65% LTV on a select basis combined with lower spreads. Values based on the lower of: (a) purchase price, (b) appraised value or (c) lender imposed capitalization rate.